افشای راست‌آزمایی جعلی بی‌بی‌سی

What exactly is the basis of your "fact-check"? BBC Persian reports "Khamenei said this" — but never states plainly that the regime's official casualty numbers are false and the real toll is far higher. Yet when it comes to Prince Reza Pahlavi, the tone changes: "We emailed his office asking for names and figures — we received no response." So a government that hides the numbers gets quoted as news, while the opposition is put in the dock over an unanswered email? That's the old playbook: 1) Amplify official figures unchallenged 2) Frame the opposition as the one with something to hide 3) Call the whole thing "impartiality" A fact-check with no baseline isn't journalism — it's narrative management. Tell us in the comments: what standard should a fact-check actually meet? Share this with someone who still trusts that framing. منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/Hq6vUtUXLb0?t=624#بیبیسیفارسی #راستیآزمایی #رسانه #ایران #رضاپهلوی #شاهزادهرضاپهلوی #جمهوریاسلامی #خامنهای #دروغرسانهای #ایراناینترنشنال #BBCPersian #FactCheck #MediaBias #Iran #IranProtests #RezaPahlavi #FreeIran #IranNews #PropagandaWatch #BBCBias #PersianMedia #IranRevolution #MediaAccountability #خبر #تحلیل