چرا اول باید سراغ نیابتیها رفت
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 Why won't a direct attack on the Islamic Republic alone work? Why is there a strategy right now that the United States, 0:06 Israel, and other countries, even Saudi Arabia, seem to have adopted, 0:09 to go after their proxy forces first? 0:13 If—I've said this before on this livestream—Mr. Trump keeps saying that for fifty- 0:17 one years the Islamic Republic has been stirring up trouble around the world, and people in 0:21 Iran say, what does he mean by fifty-one years? They've only been around for forty-seven years. Mr. 0:25 Trump views this as an issue that began when the seed of radical Islamism was planted in the Middle East region. 0:31 Iranians only focus on Iran. They think that, for instance, if everything in Iran 0:36 gets sorted out, nothing else will happen there anymore and it won't circle back around. Right now the Islamic Republic could 0:42 come under pressure, get attacked inside Iran, and some of them could go to Iraq, go to Afghanistan, 0:47 go to Pakistan, go here, go there, crawl under the table, go underground, hide for ten 0:53 years, and then come back from somewhere else. 0:56 And the Islamic Republic cannot fall while its proxy forces remain, and its proxy forces are numerous. 1:04 Besides, suppose you launch a direct attack first on the Islamic Republic, and the Islamic Republic falls. You have Fatemiyoun, 1:10 you have Zainabiyoun, you have the Popular Mobilization Forces, you have all kinds of terrorist groups 1:18 that were taking the people's money and going off to carry out terrorist acts. Now you've 1:22 struck and overthrown the regime that was funding them. Whether you want the Crown Prince (Reza Pahlavi) to come or 1:27 whoever else might come, later on in that 1:31 process that the Crown Prince (Reza Pahlavi) wants to manage, to take charge of the country—whoever it is from whatever 1:35 group—suddenly they'd have to face half a million proxy fighters. What do you 1:42 think? Can you, say, close the borders, pull down the shutters, and keep them from entering? First you have to go 1:48 after th—their proxy forces. Then do something so that they are all completely 1:53 disarmed. If Iran is to be saved, these proxy forces cannot be continually surrounding 1:57 it. 1:59 And this idea of 'strike and overthrow them now, and later we'll go fix the rest,' 2:03 is an extremely short-sighted idea. It's like that idea—excuse me—that said, 'Fire a couple of 2:11 missiles and bombs, and they will flee.' It's just like that half-baked idea. Under no circumstances should 2:17 any of these proxy forces be allowed to remain armed. 2:22 If they remain, the first thing they will do is kill the Iranian people. The first thing they will do is take the people of 2:28 Iran hostage. And that is the reason why the White House right now [is pursuing] all this...
Caption Why a direct strike on Tehran alone will not solve the crisis.
Focusing solely on the core while ignoring the regional proxy network leaves a dangerous escape hatch wide open. The Islamic Republic's operational footprint extends far beyond Iran's borders. If targeted only at home, leadership and command structures can disperse into Iraq, underground facilities, and regional safe havens to regroup.
Dismantling the proxy architecture is the decisive first step to eliminating their regional leverage and strategic depth.
Do you believe neutralizing regional proxies must precede any direct confrontation? Share your thoughts below.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/YOLPMm2Y8do?t=549#خاورمیانه #ایران #نیروهای_نیابتی #تحلیل_سیاسی #سپاه_پاسداران #امنیت_ملی #سیاست_خارجی #عراق #اسرائیل #آمریکا #MiddleEast #Iran #ProxyWar #Geopolitics #IRGC #StrategicAnalysis #ForeignPolicy #RegionalSecurity #MiddleEastCrisis #USForeignPolicy #IranRegime
