سکوت مدعیان حقوق بشر
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 What kind of opposition are these gentlemen that they see the execution of the nation's youth and remain silent? 0:06 Yes, unfortunately a certain group—well, the masks are finally coming off, the masks are dropping. Those who are Nobel 0:14 Peace Prize laureates, who are human rights activists, who made a name for themselves through human rights, hit the headlines, 0:21 and had lobbyists arrange awards for them. Then what kind of human rights is it when, faced with the slaughter 0:28 of nearly one hundred thousand Iranians, when you go talk to an international media outlet, you don't utter a single 0:33 word about it? Did the Islamic Republic not allow you? Well, you shouldn't have interviewed at all! How could you 0:41 possibly accept that? What does that even mean? 0:46 What is the meaning of this behavior, really? Whatever I say about this, some people might 0:50 say, 'Look, Bahrami, you've picked on this political activist; they do their thing, 0:56 and you do yours. You're just jealous,' or whatever. Man, this is truly indigestible. 1:04 If the person were just a political activist, we'd say, 'Fine, they oppose Dey [January protests], they oppose the Crown Prince (Reza Pahlavi); 1:08 and during Dey, the people chanted for the Crown Prince (Reza Pahlavi)—called out his name. As a result, this person 1:14 wants to edit Dey right out of Iranian history altogether, because they hate Pahlavi that much.' 1:18 That's a political activist. We'd say, 'To hell with that political activist, but that's how it is—they're anti- 1:23 Pahlavi.' If the people had chanted Rajavi's name, for example, sure, they would be delivering endless speeches about Dey and 1:29 the epics of Dey. But a human rights activist should have nothing to do with 1:36 which political faction was dominant in Dey. Look at the aspect that the Islamic Republic 1:42 committed war crimes, committed crimes against humanity. In any country, thousands of lawyers spend thousands 1:52 of days of their time just to get a massacre in a particular country registered as a crime 1:58 against humanity with international bodies—like, for example, Saddam's slaughter of the Kurds, known as 2:06 the Anfal campaign. 2:09 And then the Islamic Republic did this right in front of your eyes, in the era 2:15 of AI, the era of smartphones, with all these videos, all these corpses, 2:21 black body bags in the streets and alleys, heaps of corpses in hospital storage rooms; 2:30 a human rights activist has no damn business saying, 'Because the monarchist, pro-Pahlavi political faction 2:38 had the upper hand in these protests, I'm going to cut this out of Iran's 2:42 history.' This is a crime; this is a human rights issue.
Caption The masks are falling off. When global headlines, lobbying, and Nobel accolades are at stake, the so-called champions are everywhere—yet when Iranian youth face mass executions and brutality, an unpardonable silence takes over.
True human rights advocacy cannot be selective. One cannot claim prestige while omitting the voices of victims on international platforms. This double standard is no longer defensible.
Drop your thoughts in the comments and share this clip to demand accountability.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/TljVoq89M-0?t=3051#حقوق_بشر #ایران #نه_به_اعدام #اعتراضات_سراسری #صدای_مردم #نوبل_صلح #ایران_آزاد #دی_ماه #سکوت_خیانت_است #HumanRights #Iran #IranProtests #StopExecutionsInIran #FreeIran #StandWithIran #HumanRightsViolations #SelectiveHumanRights #NobelPeacePrize #IranNews #IranRevolution
