"Ending this threat means ending the Islamic Republic."
That single line captures Washington's shift in doctrine.
The US Treasury Secretary openly criticized previous administrations: instead of ending the threat, they merely *managed* it.
The distinction is everything:
▪️ Managing the threat = containment, negotiation, status quo
▪️ Ending the threat = structural change
And his tone signals something more — regime change is back on the policy table.
The logic is straightforward: as long as the structure exists, so does the threat. "Ending the threat" therefore means ending the structure itself.
This economic war isn't leverage for a deal. It's a mechanism aimed at a final outcome.
Do you think economic pressure can actually deliver that? Tell us in the comments.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/K6w_cC9-Ybo?t=2840#ایران #تحریم #جنگ_اقتصادی #جمهوری_اسلامی #Iran #RegimeChange #تغییر_رژیم #Sanctions #IranProtests #DDay #وزارت_خزانه_داری #EconomicWar #ایران_آمریکا #USForeignPolicy #MiddleEast #خاورمیانه #تحلیل_سیاسی #IranNews #Geopolitics #اخبار_ایران #MaximumPressure #PoliticalAnalysis #ریال #Tehran #BreakingAnalysis
