افسانه اصلاحپذیری رژیم
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 Uh, let me address the final question too, as I'm getting tired. They asked-- you must certainly be 0:03 tired as well. If the regime were to reform in the true sense of the word and become a normal government, 0:07 would you consider that better for the people and the country, or regime change, assuming the ruling system actually 0:12 reforms? But look, this is among the impossible premises. Like the sky falling to the earth or the earth 0:16 rising to the sky. Yesterday this same iss-- was raised, the day before it was raised, I have said it many times. 0:21 When does reform happen? When do you try to change the parenting approach for your child? 0:26 When you feel your child has gone astray. 0:30 When the regime believes it is standing at the summit, why would it reform? 0:35 So the regime does not believe at all that it needs to reform. It says, 'I am at the summit.' 0:39 It says. 0:41 Secondly, the governance structure does not allow for reform. When the governance structure entirely traces back to one person, 0:46 and if that one person wills it to reform, a reform happens; if he doesn't want it, it doesn't. If 0:52 he wills it, a reform takes place; tomorrow, if he wills it, he kicks the reform aside. So 0:55 this won't reform either. This becomes the whim of 'His Eminence.' His Eminence's whim one day might be reform, 1:01 another day corruption. So this won't reform either. The third issue, which is very important: let us assume 1:06 that the regime climbs down from these grandiose claims and no longer says we are at the summit. Let us assume 1:12 that the structure is reformed and they say, in the words of Abdolhossein Davari, the Supreme Leader changes from 1:19 an interventionist ruler into, uh, a demanding observer. This is the phrase that, uh, Abdolhossein Davari uses in 1:29 describing, uh, 1:31 Mojtaba Khamenei. Let's assume that happens; with what personnel? You can't even find five people in the entire 1:36 regime apparatus that could be considered relatively decent, 1:42 when they are more sour than vinegar—even if, as I say, the regime renounces its grandiose talk, stops 1:46 saying we are at the summit, and the structures are reformed with these people; that is, you cannot just say, 1:51 'Alright, God willing, they will bring in new people.' 1:53 Has the governance structure even permitted anyone who offers the slightest criticism to remain in the regime? Mostafa Mehraeen, 2:00 who went to prison, 2:02 what do you think he had said or done in this regime? What did Fatemeh Sepehri 2:05 do that she is in prison? 2:08 What did Mohammad Nourizad do that he is in prison? Many individuals, whether monarchist, leftist, 2:13 or rightist—what harm did Mostafa Tajzadeh do to the regime that he is in prison? Well, do you think this regime 2:18 is reformable? 2:22 What harm does Javad Zarif pose to the regime, yet they cannot even tolerate his words 2:26 and threaten him? They go and splash paint on Hassan Rouhani's house. Hassan Rouhani, who is a cannibal just like 2:31 them; it's just that his views are slightly different.
Caption Why is systemic reform of the Islamic Republic an absolute impossibility?
Reform requires a regime to acknowledge failure and error. When a totalitarian system constantly insists it stands "at the peak," it inherently rejects any reason or need for change.
Furthermore, in a power structure where every major decision ultimately hinges on the will of a single supreme ruler, genuine reformist mechanisms cannot exist. Expecting this system to transform itself from within is fundamentally detached from reality.
What is your take? Is internal reform completely off the table? Share your thoughts below.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/-yVmdyvqQUg?t=4815#جمهوری_اسلامی #ایران #اصلاحات #براندازی #اعتراضات_سراسری #نه_به_جمهوری_اسلامی #تحلیل_سیاسی #خامنهای #Iran #IranProtests #RegimeChange #FreeIran #IranRevolution #IranRegime #Khamenei #سیاست #آزادی #PoliticalAnalysis #MiddleEast #HumanRights #WomanLifeFreedom
